Table of Contents
Exploring Anti-Design Through a Neo-Brutalist Product Experience
Author
Date
Book a call
A comprehensive article on customising design systems, experimenting responsibly, and designing with intention in 2026's most defining trend.
When Good Design Becomes Invisible
Most modern digital products are well designed. They are clean, usable, and follow best practices. Yet somewhere along the way, many of them started feeling interchangeable, polished to the point of sameness.
During our early project discussions, one question kept surfacing: How do we create something that feels distinct without sacrificing usability?
Why Anti-Design Is Defining 2026
Anti-design has emerged as one of the dominant design trends of 2026, representing a fundamental shift in how designers approach their craft. After years of algorithm-friendly, hyper-polished aesthetics, the design community is experiencing what many are calling a creative rebellion.
Industry leaders are witnessing a deliberate rejection of AI's overly smooth visual language in favour of work that feels unmistakably human. Designers are choosing imperfection, messiness, and rawness as proof that a person, not an algorithm, made this. This is not only an aesthetic preference; it is a response to digital saturation and a hunger for authenticity.
The data backs up this shift:
- Searches for bold fonts have surged over 65%
- Collage art and handmade textures continue to climb in popularity
- Brands are moving away from safe, predictable design toward experiences that feel alive, emotional, and intentionally chaotic
Why We Started With Anti-Design, Not Ended With It
Anti-design typically appears late in the process, applied as visual flair over an already-finished product. We took a different approach.
We chose to explore anti-design from the beginning, working at the system level rather than the surface level. Instead of discarding our design system, we used it as a foundation and began questioning its assumptions:
- What happens when typography leads instead of layout?
- What if spacing becomes expressive, not just consistent?
- What if components feel editorial rather than purely functional?
Customising a Design System Without Breaking It
The challenge was not to push boundaries; it was how to do it without creating chaos.
Rather than changing everything at once, we focused on small, deliberate experiments:
- Modified Button types to start establishing the new brutalism softly on the screen
- Introduced layout flexibility for content-heavy sections
- Created component variants instead of entirely new patterns
For example, we did not build new card components from scratch. Instead, we experimented with existing ones by introducing heavier borders, uneven internal spacing, and Bolder and larger typographic contrast.
Why Neo-Brutalism Worked in a Product Context
Neo-brutalism gave us a middle ground between expressive design and functional usability.
Unlike traditional brutalism, which can feel harsh or inaccessible, neo-brutalism allows you to use bold typography without harming readability, create visual tension without confusion, and embrace rawness while maintaining structure.
For us, this approach supported a magazine-inspired experience where content felt curated and intentional, not templated and generic.
Real-World Success Stories
Platforms like Figma and Gumroad have embraced neo-brutalist approaches, demonstrating how raw, unpolished aesthetics can succeed in commercial contexts.
Figma's brand refresh uses bold contrasts and unconventional typography to emphasize creative freedom and flexibility, perfectly aligning with their design tool's purpose. The visual language reinforces what the product enables—unrestricted creativity.
Gumroad's raw aesthetic aligns with its mission of empowering independent creators. The rebellious visual language communicates that it is a platform for people charting their own paths, not another corporate marketplace. The deliberately utilitarian interface becomes part of the brand promise.
The Psychology Behind Why It Works
There's solid research backing why anti-design captures attention. The Von Restorff Effect, a psychological principle documented by German psychiatrist Hedwig von Restorff in 1933, demonstrates that when multiple similar items are presented, the one that differs from the rest is significantly more likely to be remembered.
The 15-Second Window
In a world where users spend an average of 15 seconds on a webpage, shock value works. A brutalist design does not ask for attention it demands it. The distinctive nature of anti-design creates what psychologists call enhanced memory encoding, making experiences more memorable than conventional alternatives.
When users encounter something unexpected:
- Their brain registers the deviation from the norm
- Additional cognitive resources are allocated to processing it
- The experience becomes more deeply encoded in memory
- Recall is significantly improved compared to conventional alternatives
This is a measurable impact on user engagement and brand recall, translating to higher engagement metrics, stronger word-of-mouth sharing, and more memorable user experiences.
Anti-Design ≠ Careless Design
Anti-Design Must Still Respect Accessibility
This is non-negotiable. WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) organizes accessibility requirements under four principles: content must be Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust.
Anti-design does not exempt you from these standards—it challenges you to meet them creatively.
What You MUST Do for Accessibility:
Color Contrast (WCAG AA Standard)
- Maintain a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text
- Bold typography and heavy borders can work if contrast ratios are maintained
- Use tools like WebAIM's contrast checker to verify compliance
Typography & Readability
- Keep body text at minimum 16px
- Ensure generous line height (1.5x minimum)
- Avoid extremely condensed or decorative fonts for body copy
- Bold, expressive headlines are fine—just keep body text readable
Keyboard Navigation & Focus States
- All interactive elements must be keyboard-accessible
- Visible focus indicators are required (not just on hover)
- Logical tab order must be maintained even with unconventional layouts
Alternative Text & Screen Readers
- All images need descriptive alt text
- Ensure heading hierarchy (H1, H2, H3) follows logical structure
- Do not break semantic HTML structure for visual effect
Sufficient Target Sizes
- Interactive elements must be at least 44x44 pixels
- Even if your design feels raw, buttons must be easily tappable/clickable
What NOT to Do:
1. Don not sacrifice contrast for aesthetics
Low-contrast text might look sophisticated but excludes users with visual impairments and violates legal standards.
2. Do not hide navigation or controls
Experimental layouts are fine, but users must always know how to navigate and complete tasks.
3. Do not rely solely on color to convey information
Use additional indicators like icons, labels, or patterns alongside color.
4. Do not break fundamental interaction patterns
Buttons should look clickable, links should be distinguishable, forms should be predictable.
5. Do not use motion without controls
If you include animations, provide pause/stop controls and respect prefers-reduced-motion settings.
Real-World Balance
Gumroad's raw aesthetic includes heavy borders and bold typography, but maintains proper contrast ratios and clear interactive states. The visual rebellion works because the accessibility fundamentals remain intact.
Anti-Design Still Follows Heuristic Principles
Jakob Nielsen's 10 Usability Heuristics, developed in 1990 and refined in 1994, remain the gold standard for interface design. Anti-design does not reject these principles—it interprets them differently.
How Anti-Design Aligns With Heuristics:
1. Visibility of System Status
Anti-design can actually enhance this through bold, unmissable feedback states. Heavy borders and strong typography make status changes more visible, not less.
2. Match Between System and Real World
Neo-brutalism often embraces real-world metaphors—raw materials, physical textures, tactile elements. This can create stronger connections than sterile digital interfaces.
3. User Control and Freedom
Unconventional does not mean confusing. Clear "undo" actions, visible navigation, and predictable controls still apply—they just might look different.
4. Consistency and Standards
This is where anti-design requires the most discipline. You can bend conventions, but you must be consistent within your own system. If one button has a heavy border, all buttons should follow a predictable pattern.
5. Error Prevention
Bold visual treatments can actually improve error prevention by making warnings more noticeable and actions more deliberate.
6. Recognition Rather Than Recall
Strong visual hierarchy and distinctive elements aid recognition. Anti-design's boldness can reduce cognitive load by making important elements impossible to miss.
7. Flexibility and Efficiency of Use
Power users benefit from predictable patterns. Anti-design can support efficiency through clear visual affordances and consistent interaction models.
8. Aesthetic and Minimalist Design
This seems contradictory, but it is not. The heuristic is about ensuring that visual elements support user goals, not about adhering to flat design. Bold typography can create a clearer hierarchy than minimalist layouts if used intentionally.
9. Help Users Recognise, Diagnose, and Recover from Errors
Heavy borders, bold text, and strong colour can make error messages more noticeable and actionable.
10. Help and Documentation
Even rebellious designs need clear documentation. The visual language might be unconventional, but the help content must remain accessible and searchable.
The Key Difference:
When Should You Use Anti-Design?
Anti-design is not universally applicable, but it can be powerful when used intentionally.
It works well when:
- Differentiation is a key product goal
- Brand personality matters
- Content needs to feel expressive or editorial
- Your audience is open to visual experimentation
It is less effective when:
- Speed and efficiency are the primary user goals
- Accessibility constraints are extremely strict
- Users rely on predictable patterns under high-pressure conditions
How to Experiment Safely With Anti-Design
If you are curious about anti-design but hesitant to try it in live projects, here is how to start:
- Experiment early: Explore unconventional ideas before the system becomes locked in.
- Isolate risk: Test bold ideas on a few screens or components, not the entire product.
- Use the system as a base: Bend components before you replace them entirely.
- Document intent: Be prepared to explain every rule you break.
- Balance expression with restraint: Not everything needs to be loud. Some elements should anchor the chaos.
What This Approach Taught Us
This project reinforced several principles worth carrying forward:
- Design systems should enable exploration, not restrict it
- Intentional experimentation leads to stronger outcomes than random novelty
- Anti-design works best when grounded in purpose, not rebellion
- Expression and usability do not have to compete—they can complement each other
- Accessibility and heuristics are creative challenges
Riding the Wave of Biggest Design Shifts
Anti-design is the design philosophy defining 2026. As the industry moves away from algorithmic perfection and toward human authenticity, designers who understand this shift will create experiences that truly resonate.
Our exploration proved that anti-design is not about rejecting structure—it's about reshaping it with intention. When approached thoughtfully, it helps you move beyond visual sameness and create experiences that feel memorable, expressive, and purposeful.
In a market flooded with polished sameness, imperfection has become the new differentiator. The brands and products that will stand out in 2026 are not the ones with the cleanest interfaces—they are the ones with personality, emotion, and unmistakable human touch.
Sometimes, the most impactful design decisions begin with a simple question:
What if we did not do it the usual way?
